It was good to start off the weekend with a final Dynamo home game. It ended as I thought it would with a Dynamo win, but I was disappointed that the Dynamo didn't handle Firpo better. (Recap. Recap 2.) They should have had a second goal in the first half, and should have done a better job of creating opportunities that could lead to a second goal in the second half. In the end, they made the match a lot harder on themselves and a lot more anxious for their fans by playing down to the competition.
I know that's soccer at times; but it happens a little too frequently for my tastes with this team. Of course a lot of the problem was the gamesmanship used by FIRPO to compensate for their incompetence, and the inconsistent officiating didn't help either. I think a substitute was called for earlier in the second half, but many of our off-the-bench talent was already on the field, and with Holden, Davis, and Cameron out, we didn't have a good option to help out in midfield, where we were struggling. Kei Kamara was a good sub when he came on.
Kei was an example of the best of the Dynamo that night. I loved how Kei twice waved his arms at the crowd to energize the stands. That was his way of saying "We're in a tight one down here, we need your help, guys." After the game, he and his teammates took to the center circle and applauded all four sides of the stadium. That was much needed, and much appreciated by the supporters. Soon after, my sons and I were walking behind the north goal on our way out of the stadium, when we saw Kamara walking down from the El Batallon section. I don't know what he was doing there, but I figure he had been showing his appreciation for the season-long fervent support.
(In addition to Kamara, Frankie Hejduk also knows how to get the supporters energized.)
While intermingling with the supporters groups is above and beyond the call of duty, the applauding of the fans is the sort of fan-feedback that a team should provide on a regular basis. It acknowledges the fans and is recognition that should be demonstrated by any player who expects fans to be cheering for him. I did notice that all three players subbed out (Jaqua, DeRo, and Ching) applauded the fans as they came off the field. The cheers for Jaqua, and his response, were a little more ardent due to the fact that we all knew that was his last appearance in Orange. He'll be wearing Seattle Emerald next year.
The game had a weird vibe to it. Maybe it's been too long since I attended a CONCACAF match. They didn't do the Star Spangled Banner after the line ups. The players didn't stand facing the crowd while the line ups were announced (they had moved to the shaking of hands, flipping of coins, and posing for pictures). And I didn't spot the Dynamo Girls even in the stands. I don't remember a confetti canon when Ching scored either. It was a no-frills game, I guess.
My sons and I were sitting in Section 203 for the game. We took the seats from a co-worker of mine who had season tickets but was heading out of town for the holiday. It turns out, the seats are right next to those of a former co-worker of mine. I worked with him from 1995-2000 and hadn't seen him since. It was good to catch up with him, but he did tell me a story about the Dynamo players that disturbed me. One day he came to a Dynamo Reserves match, and he saw Holden, DeRo, and another player (I can't recall who he said) watching the game from the goal line seats. He decided to go sit not too far from them. He didn't bother them -- he didn't even speak to them -- he just wanted to take in the game and watch some Dynamo first teamers root as fans too. Well, they called security on him and forced him to move. (He said he thought it was Holden, of all people, who called security.) I thought that was a pretty crappy thing for players to do at a game. It wasn't like they were out on the town; they were at a Dynamo game. If they wanted privacy, they should go to one of the boxes. It wasn't like he was bothering them anyway. I hope that my old friend just misunderstood the situation and it was security -- and security alone -- who saw him and decided to relocate him.
At any rate, the Dynamo players did show their fan appreciation on Wednesday, and they were definitely the classier of the two teams on the field. Overall, they gave us a season of quality and came close to bringing home some silverware in the Pan-Pacific Cup and SuperLiga. They had also positioned themselves well for completing the nearly impossible three-peat. However, this year, for the first time, they brought home no awards -- not even El Capitan for the first time ever. Still, they're better positioned than most teams for a solid 2009 campaign, and they're the only MLS team heading to the quarterfinals of the Champions League Cup.
A few moves off-season should ensure a good 2009 -- and hopefully a better start than 2008. We also need to get that stadium situation settled (and find a way to do so WITHOUT allowing football lines on the damn grass). If $10 million really is the difference between a downtown stadium or none, you'd think that Anschutz would pony it up since they'd easily make that back with a stadium located in the Central Business District.
Maybe such gifts are better discussed around Christmas time. Right now we're enjoying Thanksgiving and we should be thankful for what we have.
Thanks for a great season, Dynamo and Dynamofans. Here's hoping for an even better one next year.
Showing posts with label Pan-Pacific Championship. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Pan-Pacific Championship. Show all posts
Saturday, November 29, 2008
Monday, February 25, 2008
Golden Boy talk coelesces
Today B-Fall states that the Dynamo ownership issue is about to have some resolution. Boxer/promoter Oscar De La Hoya and Golden Boy Promotions shareholder Gabriel Brener (a Mexican investor with ties to the US real estate industry) will each take on 25% ownership of the team, with AEG maintaining a 50 percent stake in the Dynamo.
Ives G. believes this means that AEG will maintain ownership until the stadium is completed, then sell off the remaining shares.
Glenn Davis had an interview with De La Hoya on Davis' radio show this evening. You can eventually hear the podcast of the show here.
Interesting times. I'd prefer local ownership, but remote ownership is not a new thing in sports. I hope that any new Dynamo stakeholders don't try to tinker with a great organization in order to make it cater to preconceived notions or marketing schemes. Only time will tell what, specifically, the ownership news means. In the meantime, I guess we'll take it as it appears at face value: a sign that people want to invest in the team -- and hope for the best. In the meantime, let's get to some games to help us forget the 6-1 shellacking.
Speaking of Quake alumni being shellacked. This past Sunday, with the 6-1 debacle still festering in my mind, Fox Soccer Channel played a recap of the March 4, 1995 pasting that Manchester United gave to Ipswich. The 9-0 result is the most lopsided game in EPL history and Andy Cole's 5-goal game has never been equaled. The right back for Ipswich? Frank Yallop. He looked gassed and completely crestfallen as he picked himself up from the pitch between United goals. He looked like that a lot last season too, come to think of it. Ryan Giggs sure looked young though.
Ives G. believes this means that AEG will maintain ownership until the stadium is completed, then sell off the remaining shares.
Glenn Davis had an interview with De La Hoya on Davis' radio show this evening. You can eventually hear the podcast of the show here.
Interesting times. I'd prefer local ownership, but remote ownership is not a new thing in sports. I hope that any new Dynamo stakeholders don't try to tinker with a great organization in order to make it cater to preconceived notions or marketing schemes. Only time will tell what, specifically, the ownership news means. In the meantime, I guess we'll take it as it appears at face value: a sign that people want to invest in the team -- and hope for the best. In the meantime, let's get to some games to help us forget the 6-1 shellacking.
Speaking of Quake alumni being shellacked. This past Sunday, with the 6-1 debacle still festering in my mind, Fox Soccer Channel played a recap of the March 4, 1995 pasting that Manchester United gave to Ipswich. The 9-0 result is the most lopsided game in EPL history and Andy Cole's 5-goal game has never been equaled. The right back for Ipswich? Frank Yallop. He looked gassed and completely crestfallen as he picked himself up from the pitch between United goals. He looked like that a lot last season too, come to think of it. Ryan Giggs sure looked young though.
Sunday, February 24, 2008
The Hawaiian Debacle
Last night the Dynamo were spanked -- and spanked thoroughly -- by Bare the Brazilian and 10 other guys, collectively known as Gamba Osaka. After viewing the game, B-Fall says we "were outplayed in every aspect of the game" and Jeff Carlisle of ESPN says we were victims of a team with "superior fitness, speed, and technical ability." It's hard to argue with either assessment, given the utterly lopsided score (and the 6-1 score could have been even worse, had the woodwork not intervened and Onstad not made some stellar saves).
The loss can't be blown off as us being in rusty preseason form. (It's preseason for Osaka too.) Nor because we were missing E-Rob and D-Ro. (Osaka was missing seven quality starters.) Nope, we were just plain beaten.
Still, I didn't see Osaka as that much better of a team than the Dynamo. Maybe it was the sleepiness in my eyes. To me, Osaka was like one of those U8 youth teams that has a single kid who has developed faster than everyone else. The team relies on simple mob ball -- and the usual mistakes of other teams at this age -- to win possession. The players are trained to then give the ball to the star athlete, who proceeds to run up the score on the hapless opposition who are trying to play like big people. The other U8 teams, populated with kids who have a regular growth and development rate, are working on the skills they need to prosper in the game: tackling, dribbling, passing, shooting, and not staring at the butterflies. Yet, for all their trouble at doing things right, they are mere speed bumps as Team Prodigy runs roughshod through the age group. (Meanwhile, the coach of Team Prodigy thinks himself a genius because he's too oblivious to the fact that he is setting his players up for future failure: his star's downfall comes when others his age catch up in physical development and he has no skills to fall back on; his other players' downfall comes sooner since they weren't instructed in the fundamentals.)
This was more or less the situation last night. Osaka can be complimented for playing a compact, disciplined defensive game that totally clogged up the middle. When they won the ball back, Osaka couldn't maintain possession for long, but if they could get the ball to Bare (it didn't matter where: at the halfway line, near the touchline, in the penalty box), he'd score. That was the situation in the first half, where Osaka played truly decent soccer only during a 5-10 minute period after the Dynamo were fatigued -- and this was after the 30 minute mark when Osaka had already got their 2-1 score line for the half. In the second half, it was more of the same: channel the Dynamo to the flanks, clog up the middle, and get the ball to Bare. The Dynamo weren't outplayed in every aspect of the game, because the Dynamo were still possessing the ball and generating the threats that could lead to the eventual equalizer. Only when Bare made the goal differential insurmountable (and the Dynamo had become too despondent to fight the fatigue) did Osaka find the advanced combination play that made them look like a quality squad.
For this reason, I think there's greater upside to the Dynamo as a team than to Osaka. If a team can shut down Bare (or should Bare get injured), Osaka is in trouble. They are a one-trick pony. But what a trick that pony does!
While the Dynamo were doing the wall passes and overlapping runs, Bare-Osaka was scoring. In the end, that's all that matters in soccer: goals. So, while I'm arguing that the Dynamo weren't outclassed, they definitely were outscored -- and not by fluky goals.
Luckily, the Dynamo are a team that doesn't get too confident when things are going well, and doesn't get too bummed when they have a bad day. Also, Kinnear is no dummy and probably is relieved to see the glaring problems that need to be fixed before we face our CONCACAF opponents in the regional Champions' Cup.
LA supporters can feel better that, on the surface, their results are the same as their fellow MLSers' results: a loss to Gamba Osaka (and by only one goal!) and a win over Sydney FC. The difference is that the Dynamo dominated Sydney whereas LA backed into a victory, and the Dynamo looked dangerous (despite the story told by the goal differential) versus Osaka whereas LA looked like an amateur team playing a professional team. Where LA can feel good about themselves is that the team that played in the Pan-Pacific Championship won't be the one fielded in League Play. More of their starters played in their match versus the Dynamo reserves than in the actual tourney, which should embarrass the LAG faithful.
This year, unlike the last, we have had a good warm up before the Champions Cup. Let's hope it produces results in the CONCACAF Cup and other competitions we undertake. It'd be nice to have some trophies to accompany our MLS Cups in the trophy case.
The loss can't be blown off as us being in rusty preseason form. (It's preseason for Osaka too.) Nor because we were missing E-Rob and D-Ro. (Osaka was missing seven quality starters.) Nope, we were just plain beaten.
Still, I didn't see Osaka as that much better of a team than the Dynamo. Maybe it was the sleepiness in my eyes. To me, Osaka was like one of those U8 youth teams that has a single kid who has developed faster than everyone else. The team relies on simple mob ball -- and the usual mistakes of other teams at this age -- to win possession. The players are trained to then give the ball to the star athlete, who proceeds to run up the score on the hapless opposition who are trying to play like big people. The other U8 teams, populated with kids who have a regular growth and development rate, are working on the skills they need to prosper in the game: tackling, dribbling, passing, shooting, and not staring at the butterflies. Yet, for all their trouble at doing things right, they are mere speed bumps as Team Prodigy runs roughshod through the age group. (Meanwhile, the coach of Team Prodigy thinks himself a genius because he's too oblivious to the fact that he is setting his players up for future failure: his star's downfall comes when others his age catch up in physical development and he has no skills to fall back on; his other players' downfall comes sooner since they weren't instructed in the fundamentals.)
This was more or less the situation last night. Osaka can be complimented for playing a compact, disciplined defensive game that totally clogged up the middle. When they won the ball back, Osaka couldn't maintain possession for long, but if they could get the ball to Bare (it didn't matter where: at the halfway line, near the touchline, in the penalty box), he'd score. That was the situation in the first half, where Osaka played truly decent soccer only during a 5-10 minute period after the Dynamo were fatigued -- and this was after the 30 minute mark when Osaka had already got their 2-1 score line for the half. In the second half, it was more of the same: channel the Dynamo to the flanks, clog up the middle, and get the ball to Bare. The Dynamo weren't outplayed in every aspect of the game, because the Dynamo were still possessing the ball and generating the threats that could lead to the eventual equalizer. Only when Bare made the goal differential insurmountable (and the Dynamo had become too despondent to fight the fatigue) did Osaka find the advanced combination play that made them look like a quality squad.
For this reason, I think there's greater upside to the Dynamo as a team than to Osaka. If a team can shut down Bare (or should Bare get injured), Osaka is in trouble. They are a one-trick pony. But what a trick that pony does!
While the Dynamo were doing the wall passes and overlapping runs, Bare-Osaka was scoring. In the end, that's all that matters in soccer: goals. So, while I'm arguing that the Dynamo weren't outclassed, they definitely were outscored -- and not by fluky goals.
Luckily, the Dynamo are a team that doesn't get too confident when things are going well, and doesn't get too bummed when they have a bad day. Also, Kinnear is no dummy and probably is relieved to see the glaring problems that need to be fixed before we face our CONCACAF opponents in the regional Champions' Cup.
- The most obvious deficiency is the center defense. I did not expect this to be said of the Dynamo squad. I'm of the mind that Boswell is better than the departed Ryan Cochrane, so we should be better defensively this year than last. We have arguably improved the pieces, but apparently they aren't working in coordination...yet. At the beginning of the match, Bobby Boswell was said to be the guy to shut down Bare. He shirked this duty if that was indeed his. We knew before the match began that Bare was strong, fast, and talented. Still, our back line played him soft and didn't seem to know who had him at times. Even after halftime, when we saw firsthand the danger embodied by Bare, we didn't adjust to do better at covering him. (This failure to adjust is my biggest aggravation of the game…but maybe Bare is just. that. good.) Only his final goal, where Barrett was challenging him for the ball and Bare was force to make a tremendous volley off the pressured dribble, did Bare score DESPITE solid defending; the rest of the time he scored in the ABSENCE of solid defending. When E-Rob returns, we should be better in the center, but frankly Boswell and Ianni should have been good enough. They weren't. The defense has to do better as a unit if it's to succeed, and they better start quickly since they're going to have to give a revamped offense some cushion.
- The offense was already understood to be a concern since we've lost Ngwenya and Jaqua. Hopefully the signing of the young Argentinean forward, Franco Caraccio, helps our punch. He hopefully brings the missing pace that our attack currently lacks. If he does, then that might be all that we need to open up defenses, which would enhance and be enhanced by our threats from DeRo and Holden from distance, Davis from set pieces, and Ching on crosses from the flanks. Last night, we were generating countless threats, but few turned into genuine shots on goal due to the congestion in the middle. This is a problem we had last year too: scoring on compact defenses and bunkered defenses. Even against 10-man opposition we couldn't score if the team bunkered on us. Hopefully we do better in this aspect this year.
- The midfield didn't play particularly poorly as a unit last night. We maintained possession well in the center and on the right flank. But! The delivery to Ching and Wondo (erroneously called "Stephen Wondolowski" all night by the accented commentator) was off target most of the night. Corey Ashe still exhibited excellent athleticism but poor soccer savvy. A few shots from range (Clark and Holden, I'm looking at you) were completely off target, but they were low percentage shots to begin with. We're still at our best with D-Ro in the middle and Davis/Mullen/Holden (pick two) on the flanks and Clark as D-Mid. I think Holden is the best option for D-Ro when the Canadian has to sit out, keeping Davis wide. Frankly, the midfield is the least of our worries, but that's a good thing because I think that's the hardest element to address.
- Goalkeeper isn't an issue yet. I can't blame Pat Onstad for the scoring frenzy last night. It all goes back to the defense for leaving him out to dry. We do need a solid backup though, because Onstad's age might become an issue by increasing the likelihood of injury.
LA supporters can feel better that, on the surface, their results are the same as their fellow MLSers' results: a loss to Gamba Osaka (and by only one goal!) and a win over Sydney FC. The difference is that the Dynamo dominated Sydney whereas LA backed into a victory, and the Dynamo looked dangerous (despite the story told by the goal differential) versus Osaka whereas LA looked like an amateur team playing a professional team. Where LA can feel good about themselves is that the team that played in the Pan-Pacific Championship won't be the one fielded in League Play. More of their starters played in their match versus the Dynamo reserves than in the actual tourney, which should embarrass the LAG faithful.
This year, unlike the last, we have had a good warm up before the Champions Cup. Let's hope it produces results in the CONCACAF Cup and other competitions we undertake. It'd be nice to have some trophies to accompany our MLS Cups in the trophy case.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)