Sunday, April 27, 2008

Another freakin' Moral Victory

One of the irritating things about soccer is that class and quality don't always translate into 3 points. Sometimes not even to 1 point. Last night, from the opening kickoff, Dynamo-Houston played like the home team. They were confident. They were creative. They played like professionals, particularly in the midfield. They controlled possession and territory. While Columbus was hesitant and forced to react to the play around them, and were left hoping for a break on a set play.

Well, you got that break, Columbus. Congrats on your 100th win, Sigi!

You think I'm a homer who is trying to paint the best picture of his team after a bitter loss? Well, you're right. But here's a quote from the opposing coach who apparently also realizes that the Dynamo are a class above his team: "We might have set a league record for blocked shots by a team tonight...They're a good team and when you look at it from a soccer aspect, maybe they had a little more of the game." At least Sigi's post-game soccer analysis isn't as myopic as Steve Morrow's is after FC Dallas games.

Here are some examples of the class of the Dynamo:
  • Right on the 6:00 mark there's an excellent combination: DeRo on the right drops the ball to Mulrooney, who touches it square to Clark and falls back to create a good angle. Clark drops it to Mulrooney who passes it to DeRo who dummies the ball then breaks down the line. Mullan gets the ball and pushes it forward to DeRo down the line who is facing a very disorganized Crew defense, but a desperate sliding tackle from Moffat pushes the ball into touch for a Dynamo throw in.
  • 10th minute: DeRo just left of center pushes the ball through to Davis on the left. A one touch pass to Barrett, then a Barrett-Davis-Barrett pass exchange opens up the defense a bit, then Barrett threads a pass to DeRo who makes a one-touch flick to an onrushing Barrett, who gets fouled right on the left boundary of the penalty box.
  • A minute after the second half restart, an excellent 3-person passing combination freezes the Crew defense giving Clark an opportunity saved by Hesmer.
  • In the 89th minute, a aerial cross to Ching is headed down to Holden, who lays it off again to set up a dynamite sliding shot by Barrett that was heading to the upper 90, only for Hesmer to make an outstanding jumping dive to catch the rocket.
These aren't the only chances we had, of course. We had 15 shots (to the Crew's 9), and probably another 10 more dangerous opportunities that didn't result in shots. Besides some of the plays mentioned above, there were:
  • 2nd minute: Caraccio nods a free kick on frame, straight at the GK.
  • 12th minute: An apparent Davis goal gets waived off due to an offside DeRo.
  • 34th minute: Davis chips a ball in to Carracio. The ball is mishandled by Hesmer, and Caraccio tries to pick up the trash before a general scrum forms on the goal line. Hesmer is able to get his hands around the ball in the middle of the writhing orgy to stop the play. I've got a question on this: with O'Rourke and Carroll (and, admittedly, Caraccio) trying to play the ball while on the ground, how is a free kick not awarded to somebody?
  • In the 63rd minute, Mulrooney picks up the pieces from a broken Dynamo free kick in the attacking third, gets an aerial to Ching who chests it and...well...how did he not do something better with that one?
  • In the next minute, Mullan drives a ball to the far post that a sliding Caraccio is inches away from touching into the net.
  • In the 69th minute, a DeRo rocket is bobbled by Hesmer, but the lack of follow up ensures nothing comes of it. DeRo has another dangerous shot in the 74th.
  • In the 83rd, Ashe has an uncharacteristically awesome shot heading to the far lower net, which is saved by Hesmer. This makes perhaps the first game that both Barrett and Ashe (who are known for their other attributes) have some of the most impressive and challenging shots on goal.
This isn't to say that the Crew totally stole the game from the Dynamo. They had their chances, but they weren't the result of impressive play. In fact, as with much of the LA game, the Dynamo looked like a professional team playing against reserves. Still, this is the MLS, and individual brilliance or a well-orchestrated set play can make the difference.

In the 22nd minute, the Crew take advantage of the only corner kick they get in the first half. BoBo makes a booboo and kind of hangs out in no-mans land. As Clark and DeRo run by him with their respective marks, BoBo sees -- too late! -- that Marshall is free and keying in on the incoming ball. BoBo gets there -- too late! -- and the ball is headed in bouncy-fashion towards the goal. Ianni is there, deflects it, then tries to heel flick it out of danger before Moreno manages to pick up the trash and knock the ball past Onstad and Barrett. BoBo didn't really have that bad of a game, but he is responsible for this goal. And, ironically, if Ianni hadn't done what a defender is supposed to do (that is: block the shot), Onstad would have easily gotten the ball as he was perfectly positioned for it. Fate worked against us, though, and the blocked shot set Moreno up for a typically scrappy Moreno goal. One corner = one goal for the home team playing like a visiting team.

The Yellow Ones would have more chances -- In the 2nd minute the Dynamo handed the Crew a free freekick when Onstad picked up a back pass from Mulrooney (it came to naught); Padula had a rocket that just missed the mark in the 35th; a Houston defensive breakdown gave Onstad a chance to show his awesomeness with a flying save in the 47th; in the 55th minute Robbie Rogers dribbles down and gets off a shot that is easily corralled by Onstad (if that had been Moreno dribbling, he would have flown through the air as Mullan engaged him in the hopes of conning the ref for a free kick); in the 74th Moreno jumps around Ianni to head a corner kick on frame and forcing a goal line clearance by Barrett -- but they were mostly the result of individual talent or nicely executed set plays. Those are certainly components of good soccer, but not the definition of good soccer.

Of course, being shut out isn't anywhere in the definition of good soccer. Nevertheless, the Dynamo played inspiring soccer in every aspect but the scoring aspect. I'm sure many fans are tired of this. It's a moral victory, but an actual loss.

Let's switch to some off-the-field observations.

  • When did the Columbus crew take out stands behind the north (?) goal to put in a stage. I guess that's the standard for Hunt SWICS (remember?: Soccer-When-It's-Convenient_Stadiums): kill some of the passion by placing a barren concrete platform that permanently reserves a quarter of the stands for non-soccer activities. Both Pizza Hunt Park and Crew Stadium sport this abomination. It looks like this happened between last season and this one. The Columbus Dispatch says: "The Crew appears to have lost few of its most ardent supporters, some who were supplanted from their home in the stadium's north end by the new permanent stage."
  • Props to the remaining Crew faithful who made Davis' job difficult on those corner kicks in front of the supporters. Kudos to Davis for not succumbing to the pressure.
  • Janette Fernandez is simply awful in sport interviews. Please, somebody, give her some prepared and intelligent questions for halftime and after the game.
  • Chivas got skunked by LA last night. Maybe we'll be able to score against Chivas next week at The Rob. Last year's goalkeeper of the year (Brad Guzan) isn't doing much better than last year's defensive squad of the year (that is us, y'all).
  • The League's bottom dwellers at this writing are today's San Jose and yesteryear's San Jose. Is that some sort of poetic statement?
Media roundup:
The MLS game review, and article.

The Chronicle article. And player ratings.

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

You just summarize soccer, that is why soccer is the most popular sport in the world, sometimes class, sometimes playing better, sometimes lots of chances don´t earn you a win, that´s because you don´t earn wins, goals get you wins.

Soccer is a weird sport, sometimes the ball just doesn´t want to get in, sometimes teams have 5, 9 or 12 games in a row in which no matter how many chances they have th eball just doesn´t go inside, and sometimes, teams with almost no chances at all have 5, 9 or 12 games in a row in which the ball goes inside every time, they have 3 chances per game and score 2 to win, or they shoot twice and score once.


Do you feel outraged?, do you feel soccer life is not fair?, do you feel bad karma?, great, you are suppose to feel that way, you are a fan, and those feelings keep you hook.

Anonymous said...

Ching needs to be benched to force him to regain his focus. Caraccio should play the full 90 paired with either Wondolowski or Cameron. Ching can come in as a sub maybe. "BoBo" needs to be benched for Ianni as soon as Robinson is healthy. If they dont get a win at home against Chivas, they need to do something serious because they wont be doing any threepeat. Maybe they could win an Open Cup match.

Anonymous said...

Why do you call it dynamo-houston? backwards i mean?

M@ said...

Mongoose,
Hmm. Here are some thoughts on that one:

Numbed by the ubiquitous naming convention for US sports franchises, "The [City] [Mascot]s", I decided to go a different route as a subtle act of rebellion, perhaps. Maybe it is an homage to the global use of the name (with Dinamo Bucharest,Dynamo Dresden, Dynamo Kiev, etc.). Soccer is an American sport (don't listen to the hype) as well as a global sport, and Dynamo Houston ties the two spheres together. I also think the reversal makes for a more interesting -- dare I say poetic? -- syllabic meter.

Similarly, to entertain myself I tend to twist words rather than typing whole words or phrases. Call it creative laziness. Like many, I use DeRo/D-Ro and ERob/E-Rob, but I also feel the urge to use the likes of BoBo instead of repeatedly typing "Bobby 'Brick Foot' Boswell" or maybe The Jeeze or The Gals instead of "The Los Angeles Galaxy, Satan's Own" (a team some call The G's). SWICS is for the so-called soccer-specific stadiums. For players, most of the time I just use last names, but some folks are lucky enough to have other terms of endearment, like Brad Davis, or "Keebler."

Landon Donovan is Lan-Don in keeping with the D-Ro/E-Rob convention, because how many people have a first name that is comprised of the first syllable of their first and last name? Sometimes he's ElDee. I'm flexible.

I don't apply the D-Ro and E-Rob convention to "Dynamo Houston," because I think the puerile among us would take D-Ho to be, um, derogatory...