The loss can't be blown off as us being in rusty preseason form. (It's preseason for Osaka too.) Nor because we were missing E-Rob and D-Ro. (Osaka was missing seven quality starters.) Nope, we were just plain beaten.
Still, I didn't see Osaka as that much better of a team than the Dynamo. Maybe it was the sleepiness in my eyes. To me, Osaka was like one of those U8 youth teams that has a single kid who has developed faster than everyone else. The team relies on simple mob ball -- and the usual mistakes of other teams at this age -- to win possession. The players are trained to then give the ball to the star athlete, who proceeds to run up the score on the hapless opposition who are trying to play like big people. The other U8 teams, populated with kids who have a regular growth and development rate, are working on the skills they need to prosper in the game: tackling, dribbling, passing, shooting, and not staring at the butterflies. Yet, for all their trouble at doing things right, they are mere speed bumps as Team Prodigy runs roughshod through the age group. (Meanwhile, the coach of Team Prodigy thinks himself a genius because he's too oblivious to the fact that he is setting his players up for future failure: his star's downfall comes when others his age catch up in physical development and he has no skills to fall back on; his other players' downfall comes sooner since they weren't instructed in the fundamentals.)
This was more or less the situation last night. Osaka can be complimented for playing a compact, disciplined defensive game that totally clogged up the middle. When they won the ball back, Osaka couldn't maintain possession for long, but if they could get the ball to Bare (it didn't matter where: at the halfway line, near the touchline, in the penalty box), he'd score. That was the situation in the first half, where Osaka played truly decent soccer only during a 5-10 minute period after the Dynamo were fatigued -- and this was after the 30 minute mark when Osaka had already got their 2-1 score line for the half. In the second half, it was more of the same: channel the Dynamo to the flanks, clog up the middle, and get the ball to Bare. The Dynamo weren't outplayed in every aspect of the game, because the Dynamo were still possessing the ball and generating the threats that could lead to the eventual equalizer. Only when Bare made the goal differential insurmountable (and the Dynamo had become too despondent to fight the fatigue) did Osaka find the advanced combination play that made them look like a quality squad.
For this reason, I think there's greater upside to the Dynamo as a team than to Osaka. If a team can shut down Bare (or should Bare get injured), Osaka is in trouble. They are a one-trick pony. But what a trick that pony does!
While the Dynamo were doing the wall passes and overlapping runs, Bare-Osaka was scoring. In the end, that's all that matters in soccer: goals. So, while I'm arguing that the Dynamo weren't outclassed, they definitely were outscored -- and not by fluky goals.
Luckily, the Dynamo are a team that doesn't get too confident when things are going well, and doesn't get too bummed when they have a bad day. Also, Kinnear is no dummy and probably is relieved to see the glaring problems that need to be fixed before we face our CONCACAF opponents in the regional Champions' Cup.
- The most obvious deficiency is the center defense. I did not expect this to be said of the Dynamo squad. I'm of the mind that Boswell is better than the departed Ryan Cochrane, so we should be better defensively this year than last. We have arguably improved the pieces, but apparently they aren't working in coordination...yet. At the beginning of the match, Bobby Boswell was said to be the guy to shut down Bare. He shirked this duty if that was indeed his. We knew before the match began that Bare was strong, fast, and talented. Still, our back line played him soft and didn't seem to know who had him at times. Even after halftime, when we saw firsthand the danger embodied by Bare, we didn't adjust to do better at covering him. (This failure to adjust is my biggest aggravation of the game…but maybe Bare is just. that. good.) Only his final goal, where Barrett was challenging him for the ball and Bare was force to make a tremendous volley off the pressured dribble, did Bare score DESPITE solid defending; the rest of the time he scored in the ABSENCE of solid defending. When E-Rob returns, we should be better in the center, but frankly Boswell and Ianni should have been good enough. They weren't. The defense has to do better as a unit if it's to succeed, and they better start quickly since they're going to have to give a revamped offense some cushion.
- The offense was already understood to be a concern since we've lost Ngwenya and Jaqua. Hopefully the signing of the young Argentinean forward, Franco Caraccio, helps our punch. He hopefully brings the missing pace that our attack currently lacks. If he does, then that might be all that we need to open up defenses, which would enhance and be enhanced by our threats from DeRo and Holden from distance, Davis from set pieces, and Ching on crosses from the flanks. Last night, we were generating countless threats, but few turned into genuine shots on goal due to the congestion in the middle. This is a problem we had last year too: scoring on compact defenses and bunkered defenses. Even against 10-man opposition we couldn't score if the team bunkered on us. Hopefully we do better in this aspect this year.
- The midfield didn't play particularly poorly as a unit last night. We maintained possession well in the center and on the right flank. But! The delivery to Ching and Wondo (erroneously called "Stephen Wondolowski" all night by the accented commentator) was off target most of the night. Corey Ashe still exhibited excellent athleticism but poor soccer savvy. A few shots from range (Clark and Holden, I'm looking at you) were completely off target, but they were low percentage shots to begin with. We're still at our best with D-Ro in the middle and Davis/Mullen/Holden (pick two) on the flanks and Clark as D-Mid. I think Holden is the best option for D-Ro when the Canadian has to sit out, keeping Davis wide. Frankly, the midfield is the least of our worries, but that's a good thing because I think that's the hardest element to address.
- Goalkeeper isn't an issue yet. I can't blame Pat Onstad for the scoring frenzy last night. It all goes back to the defense for leaving him out to dry. We do need a solid backup though, because Onstad's age might become an issue by increasing the likelihood of injury.
LA supporters can feel better that, on the surface, their results are the same as their fellow MLSers' results: a loss to Gamba Osaka (and by only one goal!) and a win over Sydney FC. The difference is that the Dynamo dominated Sydney whereas LA backed into a victory, and the Dynamo looked dangerous (despite the story told by the goal differential) versus Osaka whereas LA looked like an amateur team playing a professional team. Where LA can feel good about themselves is that the team that played in the Pan-Pacific Championship won't be the one fielded in League Play. More of their starters played in their match versus the Dynamo reserves than in the actual tourney, which should embarrass the LAG faithful.
This year, unlike the last, we have had a good warm up before the Champions Cup. Let's hope it produces results in the CONCACAF Cup and other competitions we undertake. It'd be nice to have some trophies to accompany our MLS Cups in the trophy case.
No comments:
Post a Comment